It's obvious we have different views on this, maybe our standpoints are irreconcilable. So further discussion might just be equivalent to banging our heads in the wall. Anyway...
GoldfishX wrote:I'll agree there's bias by way of musical tastes, composers, sources of music (read: games, movies, nightclubs, whatever). I don't agree that there's widespread bias by way of place of origin
I find the above to be a contradiction. Place of origin can undoubtedly be sub-categorized under "source of music". Japanese VGM, no matter how vastly different individual composers might be from each other, has a certain flair if you make a sweep over the entire field of it, just as grunge rock from Seattle in the early 1990s has a certain flair, just like British punk rock from the late 1970s has a certain kind of style, etc., etc.. There is an overlapping effect between the music and it's origin: to deny that is to try in vain to remove an intrinsic aspect of the music.
I suggest you have a way too atomistic and detached view of what I'm trying to say. I'm definitely not saying that place of origin is the ultimate arbiter of a person's tastes, or even a major factor. But what I am saying is that it is a factor that is there, and if you deny it, the only thing you're doing is fooling yourself.
Let me illustrate my point with some very crude examples...
I do not look to Japan to find good dark ambient releases. I do not look to Argentina to find good metal releases. I do not look to Egypt to find good industrial releases. I do not usually look much outside of Japan to find good game music releases.
I do this because I discriminate and discern out from my experience and knowledge up till now. I am unavoidably trapped in a biased view whatever I do. This bias may have very securely founded grounds and in essence even be largely true. But that doesn't really change the fact that it will work as an inductive filter that I apply everytime I need to make a quick judgement. To illustrate with your own points:
GoldfishX wrote:(...)If there is bias via place of origin, I believe it's an underlying product of what the place produces(...)
(...)I'd buy the Falcom album first because it's Falcom and they have a glowing feedback rating from me (...) Normally, if a Japanese company puts out something that interests me, I've had past (and generally positive) experience with them that gives them an unfair advantage in choosing product. (...)
Entirely agreed. So what are we fighting over...? As I suggested before, it might be the ambiguity of the word "bias". In my view, the word applies very well to the sentences by you that I quoted just above. It doesn't matter really how well-informed your opinion of something is, once it is in place as a filtering faculty, you are operating under bias. If you didn't have that ability, you wouldn't even know where to start to look for music. To make it even more fundamental: if you didn't have that ability, you wouldn't even be able to discern what you call "music" from every other succession of auditory input. You have cut out a certain path or mold for what you like based on previous experiences. And part of this picture is place of origin of the produced music (how big this part is, however, is another question). Place of origin will always be of certain consideration to you when you decide what new music to explore. Hence = bias.
GoldfishX wrote:You must be seeing something I'm not then, because your way of promoting something as being "non-Japanese" on top of its' other qualities makes me raise more of an eyebrow than any straight Japanese bias I've encountered. Bringing culture into play like that actually hurts what you're trying to help more than it helps it. Just a heads-up on that.
I must certainly be seeing something you're not.
And as for "your way of promoting something as being "non-Japanese" on top of its' other qualities"... Please go to the top of this thread and start to read it again, carefully. Who started to bring up this question...? (Hint if you don't want to read through all of the thread again: it's mentioned the first time in post #9). You are really making a hen out of a feather here, I've never crusaded this issue anyway near as hard as you suggest. I still remember having a similar (though much more confused, on both sides) discussion with you 4 years ago in a thread I started regarding the Halo OST (too bad the archives don't stretch that far back - it would've been a blast to read now!). Other than that and my original thread on the Jets'n'Guns OST, there hasn't really been much. And even if you go back to my original thread on this matter, the most you'll find is: "Since it isn't done by a Japanese composer, I know some people will want to overlook it by default, but I URGE anyone into metal music to check it out. " I added that bit since I knew there would be people reading it ready to dismiss Machinae Supremacy as yet another The Minibosses-esque Western VGM cover band that wasn't worth shit, and I still think that consideration is entirely valid. The vast majority of what I wrote in my post was a description of the music itself, and I tacked that on almost in passing. "promoting something as being "non-Japanese" on top of its' other qualities"...? Please.
In a way, your view that I'm "promoting something as being "non-Japanese" on top of its' other qualities" is just another example of a judgement passed from a standpoint of incomplete knowledge...