Was an entirely new thread for this bit of news really necessary, when a topic already exists just a few rows down?
Anyway, one negative review does not a general consensus make - especially when it's offset by a number of more glowing impressions before it. That said, the reviewer does bring up some comments that might be called for concern, such as the overuse of CG effects, and the relationship factor. (I loved the father-son rapport in The Last Crusade; it was one of my most favorite aspects of that film.)
avatar! wrote:and I'm sure Angela will say it's fantastic
Not necessarily, now. For all the self-hype I've been building myself upon, there's a chance that it won't be as good as I'm hoping it'll be - and I won't know for sure until I walk outta that theater. I've learned to rely less and less on the critics for the final say, and use my own judgment as a barometer. It's a strange way of reviewing, but it's worked for me so far.
.... ;)
avatar! wrote:but being a huge fan of Raiders, which I thought was by far the best of the bunch, I'm sure I'll be disappointed.
If you're so sure, then why see the new movie at all? No, serious question. If you know your experience with the Indy series had been shattered twice before, and that nothing will ever match up to Raiders, then why aim for thrice?