Soundtrack Central The best classic game music and more

    Pages: 1

Angela Aug 15, 2010

Saw The Expendables last night.  Our own rein calls it: "Stallone assembled the ultimate collection of over-the-hill hard guys for nothing other than a dreadfully conventional actioner."

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing.  I imagine most people who were even remotely interested in this film had an inkling that plot would be treated as disposable baggage.  There are a couple of lazy attempts at fleshing out back stories for some of these guys; a few male bonding sequences infused with macho posturing, along with a platonic damsel-in-distress relationship yanked straight out of Stallone's handbook of storytelling.  But ultimately, that's all inconsequential to the big action sequences on display.  And there's no sugar-coating said action; there's blades, both of the stabbing and hurling type, hand to hand combat, wrestling take-downs, heavy artillery, and explosions aplenty.  The final act is a testosterone-laden dream; like 2008's Rambo before it, it all becomes a gloriously nonstop orgy of chaotic action and gratuitous violence. 

The problem is, there's absolutely no sense of urgency, danger, or emotional resonance.  Our heroes are all unstoppable supermen who pretty much get the job done each and every time.  Hardly expendable, and not much more memorable.  One other qualm I had with the action is the sped up framework.  I'm not quite sure how to explain it technically, but it was the same as Rambo before it; some scenes were shot and edited in such a way that the frames appear to play out faster than the usual 24FPS.  It gives the action a sort of hyper, elevated feel that comes off looking more hokey than adrenaline inducing.  It's a deliberate choice in direction, but it took me out of the movie on more than one occasion.

As for the star-studded cast, it is disappointing that most of them are relegated to secondary roles of extremely varying degrees.  When it comes down to it, this is ultimately Stallone's and Statham's film, with Li, Crews, and Couture acting as secondary backup.  Rourke sits out of the action, and the Willis/Schwarzenegger cameo are but a few scant minutes long.  But credit's given where credit's due: the former has something resembling an actor's role, while the latter made for the best tongue-in-cheek cameo in the entire movie.

Musically, Brian Tyler's just being Brian Tyler.  Yet more paint-by-numbers action material and completely interchangeable with every other movie he's done.  It's fine for the film, and little else.
 
If you're going in expecting a conventional actioner, then you may end up enjoying The Expendables.  It's cinematic viewing at its most basest, and while seeing shit get beaten, torn, and blown up always manages to provide a giddy thrill, here, it's all too vapid and fleeting.  Personally, I wanted a bit more out of this one.

Ashley Winchester Aug 15, 2010

So what you're saying is The Expendables is... expendable? Rather fitting; at least the title's honest, eh?

Carl Aug 15, 2010 (edited Aug 15, 2010)

Your box office cash supply sure is expendable smile

Of course you wanted it to be more satisfying, it's like wanting to fall in love but you're with a cheap hooker instead, and you certainly know by now that cheap thrills aren't going to be fulfilling.

brandonk Aug 16, 2010

Another class review Angela.  Kinda felt like it would be what you described...did well in tho this weekend, so good for Sly and Co...

Smeg Aug 16, 2010

Carl wrote:

Of course you wanted it to be more satisfying, it's like wanting to fall in love but you're with a cheap hooker instead, and you certainly know by now that cheap thrills aren't going to be fulfilling.

Hey, it worked in Pretty Woman.

Razakin Aug 18, 2010 (edited Aug 18, 2010)

Just got back from watching this, and loved every minute of it. Especially the action scenes, nice and brutal, even if the slight annoying hand camera / fast cut didn't work for all the scenes (except for the car chase one, really loved that one).

Movie was just plain old good action stuff, without much time wasted for any silly plot thingies, who needs those with movies like this. And can't say anything bad about the main cast, even if it was like Angela said, basically a Stallone/Statham film, everyone got their time on the screen. And when they did get it, it was usually good or funny. And can't hate scenes like the church scene with Stallone, Willis & Schwarzenegger, especially the president jab.

Tyler's score did remind me bit of John Powell's handiwork, but maybe they're all from the same school, who knows. Important thing was it worked in the movie as it was meant to be, not probably gonna buy it.

Only gripes I had with the movie in the end were the CGI blood (and other effects like, Austin's end, that didn't look good quality at all and the modern day way of shooting action scenes. But then I do have lots of old 80's / 90's action movies to watch if I want to enjoy old school.

Carl wrote:

it's like wanting to fall in love but you're with a cheap hooker instead, and you certainly know by now that cheap thrills aren't going to be fulfilling.

Well, at least the hooker did know the tricks to keep me happy. :P

Edit: Forgot also to give credits to Stallone and David Callaham for good screenplay.

leila Sep 28, 2010

Smeg wrote:
Carl wrote:

Of course you wanted it to be more satisfying, it's like wanting to fall in love but you're with a cheap hooker instead, and you certainly know by now that cheap thrills aren't going to be fulfilling.

Hey, it worked in Pretty Woman.

hahaha
Anyway good review...
Hey, has anyone noticed that teaming up of famous stars for action films/ espionage stuff is the trend in movies today?

    Pages: 1

Board footer

Forums powered by FluxBB