avatar! wrote:As long as people support it, this will exist. It's certainly not "evil" in my opinion, but I can't help read that article and just think that it's a "sad waste of a life". You could argue this is no different than other professional sports, and I would agree. I also think those other sports are a waste too. Just my opinion!
I read that article at work today and I knew about the gaming addiction, but I didn't know about the type of money involved. It reminds me of the Far Side comic where hopeful parents are observing their child playing Nintendo and then dreaming of lucrative opportunities for Mario players.
I wouldn't go so far to say that professional gaming and sports in general are a waste, but I do think that too much money is involved. If professional athletes truly enjoyed their sports, they would strive just as hard to be pros for less than $50,000 per year. Ticket and food prices are too high at pro sporting events, so not as many go as would like to go.
Another of my opinions is that scientists, teachers, firefighters, and law enforcement should, at the least, be paid more than people that do not help us (athletes). Some athletes surely donate money, but they shouldn't have that much to begin with. There's no reason why people that play games should be sitting on hoards of cash and deciding who to help and who not to help. Why should they be arbiters? Why are people that play games and act like someone else in front of a camera given so much financial power?
Edit: Even truck drivers should get more than pro athletes, since they do much more for society than athletes.