Great subject for a thread!
This badass mother right here. His artwork was featured in an astronomy themed issue of Highlights for Children that I read a long time ago as a child. Thanks to movies like Blade Runner, Star Wars, and 2001: A Space Odyssey, I had developed a love for space-related imagery at an early age, so seeing Chelsey Bonestell's artwork fueled my love of science fiction further still. I couldn't remember his name for the longest time. Took me a whole on Google to get it.
Anyways, I love his starscapes. They really illustrate the majesty, vastness and loneliness of space. His paintings of Jupiter and Saturn helped me to understand just how massive these bodies really are and made me appreciate life on a cosmic scale, even if some of them have turned out to be slightly inaccurate as more information regarding the planets themselves came to light.
Sadly, example of his work are a bit difficult to find, but here are a few;
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ncm7qEKa8to/U … ercury.jpg
http://spaceshipdreams.com/wp-content/u … estell.jpg
As for others, there's a Japanese artist who rose to prominence in the 80's for his retro-futuristic science fiction art, but I'll be damned if I can ever remember his name. His subject matter deals a lot with depictions of women who have cybernetic modifications, such as cyborg limbs, faces, etc. A lot of these are sexual in nature, so I wouldn't post examples here anyways, but he also draws quite a few cars, airplanes, and animals too, with the same science fiction motif overlaid on almost all of it.
Can't remember his name at all, though. Bugging me.
Finally, there's my holy trinity of comic artists who elevated the comic strip to extremely high levels of quality that quite simply haven't ever been touched, let alone succeeded. George Herriman's Krazy Kat, Walt Kelly's Pogo, and Bill Watterson's Calvin and Hobbes are all so vastly different from other comic strips and each other that you could probably make an art gallery for each one.
Herriman's landscapes take as much from his own dreams as they do from the Navajo deserts that inspired them, resulting in some gently twisted scenery. The overarching narrative of the strip plays with the musicality of relationships, with the misunderstood affections of a cat for a mouse driving things forward. It's whimsical, playful, mischievious, and about as masterfully told as a story of a cat being repeatedly beaned on the noggin can be.
Walt Kelly's Pogo was a different beast. In stark contrast to the quiet tones and lines of Herriman's art, Kelly's work was busy and fanciful, with broad, bold inkwork creating an inviting, warm look to the strip. The narrative here was just as busy and cluttered; It can broadly be defined as a political strip, making fun of the foibles of relevant social issues occurring throughout the strip's run, and peppered with a vast cavalcade of eclectic characters corresponding to many important politicians of the time.
Calvin and Hobbes is probably the most familiar comic strip to many on this site, so no explanation needed here. Watterson's artwork made brilliant use of his frustrating lack of space, something he was quite vocal about in the few interviews he gave. His strip was in many ways a product of the times; gone were the full-page layouts of yesteryear that allowed the likes of Windsor McCay or Will Eisner to succeed with in favor of a more compact, manufactured layout that severely hamstringed any artistic merit to shine through on many contemporary strips. Still, with plot elements like Calvin's daydreams (Spaceman Spiff, Tracer Bullet, or Stupendous Man), he was able to make Calvin's world spring forth from a potentially castratingly small work space. Sublime for that reason alone, let alone the narrative brilliance of the strip itself.