the_miker wrote:It's not really fair to compare the two situations. Sony didn't put out a press release asking hackers to kill PSN for a month. Nintendo did put out a press release and it essentially said "Hey early adopters, thanks for the free 80 bucks, here's a bunch of games you've already played." At least the Sony offerings were current generation and, you know, original.
I'm going to have to disagree here. The only reason we got anything free from Sony is because they were under a media shitstorm (and rightfully so). Sony let 70 MILLION people's data get stolen. That's much worse than an early price drop.
Nintendo, on the other hand, doesn't really owe early adopters anything since that's the risk of being an early adopter. You get to enjoy the product sooner, so you pay more and you deal with kinks. That's just how it goes. I think Nintendo is doing the right thing to retain their loyal customers by offering 20 free games, even if we've probably all the played them before. And you already know how I feel about Sony's selection of free games which were selected more for their ability to advertise their sequels than on their own merits. Obviously it would be better if both companies gave affected users digital store credits instead of games, but that's costly (third parties would have to be compensated for lost sales) so it doesn't happen. I think the 3DS was a bit overpriced at $250, but I chose to buy it at the price, and I've been enjoying it for four months, so the free games are just a nice bonus. I really think the 3DS' problem is not so much the price as the utter lack of software are services. Nintendo still hasn't fixed that.
the_miker wrote:Who in their right mind is going to buy a 3DS between now and the 12th? No one, because 80 bucks for a bunch of old "been there, done that" games is silly.
Actually, I think clever people would do that. Most major stores like Best Buy have 30-day price matching policies. You buy now, you get the free games. On 8/12, you take your receipt back to BBY and get your $80 back.
the_miker wrote:The price drop could be due to many factors.. 3DS not selling well, third party devs pissed about hardware sales, disappointing software lineup, 3D is too gimmicky, Vita's $250 price, take your pick.
I think lack of sales, too much inventory, retailer disappointment, and third party pressure (look at all the 3DS game delays and cancellations lately) are probably the biggest factors. I expect the Vita to struggle every bit as much as the 3DS, and the 3DS price drop isn't doing it any favors. The funny thing about all of this is that it's a direct result of Nintendo's greed. That's what being #1 does to a company. Remember how high on itself Sony was when they announced the $600 PS3 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOHqG1nc … re=related)? They went from #1 to #3 and Nintendo went from #3 to #1. When you're on top, you get cocky, and Nintendo got cocky. The enthusiast press went nuts for the 3DS at E3 2010, so Nintendo made it a luxury item. I think that strategy could have worked if the company had better launch titles and launched with a decent digital strategy. Of course, neither of those things happened and word of mouth began to work against them very quickly. Nintendo knew the software and services wouldn't be ready by the end of its FY2011 but rushed the system out to compensate for lagging Wii sales. They should have delayed it until Fall 2011. I hope they learn something from this.