Eirikr wrote:Anyway, as you mention, P2 had the whole Tatsuya and Jun thing going on, but I've never played Innocent Sin so I can't comment on it.
Well, I have played Innocent Sin, which is exactly why I'll wait till I actually play P4 myself to decide whether the portrayal is "progressive" or not. IS had none of the mocking aspect (hell, you could even decide late in the game if the main character was gay or not), which is why I suspect that people are overreacting over this P4 thing. A thought: maybe the portrayal of this gay character is so skillfully made that, rather than aiming to mock homosexuals, it made your gay friend feel the pressures and taboos he experiences everyday in Japanese society in a very explicit fashion? Good art can actually hurt sometimes. Maybe they don't mean to mock as much as raise awareness?
On the other hand, P3 and P4 are done by a mostly different team than P2 was. Seeing as how popular the series has become the last few years, maybe they went down the populist way and served the Japanese gamer masses the stereotypical, mocking view of homosexuals to ensure that the game would retain a "controversial" edge, while still keeping it "safe"...? That would really suck.
Anyway, I hope they didn't choose the latter. One of the Persona series' hallmarks has always been its deep and multi-faceted portrayal of human psychology and the fears and insecurities that lie under the surface, in ways which make most RPGs seem like Saturday morning cartoons in comparison. We'll see how P4 measures up to that tradition.